Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Authors

1 Researcher in Institute for Social and Cultural Studies

2 Associate Professor of Phlosophy of Education, Kharazmi University

3 Assistant Professor of English Language Education, Urmia University

Abstract

In this article, we have tried to reconstruct some of the implications of socio-cultural approach for language education, with a view to the theory of discourse ethics.
 
Our main concept is based on the idea that although socio-cultural approach has had many advantages for the field of language education, it has not been able to give a proper moral aspect to language education due to the lack of normative resources for explaining how to reach mutual understanding and agreements in linguistic interactions. It is emphasized that this deficit can be amended by the theory of discourse ethics. After all, the implications of this normative socio-cultural approach are explored in the areas of language-educational research, teaching and evaluation. The moral aspects of these three areas are highlighted. 

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Michael Holquist (ed.), Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). Speech genres and late essays. Trans. Vern McGee, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). The forms of capital. J. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and symbolic power. John B. Thompson (ed.), Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bruner, Jerome (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (1980). Rules and representation. New York: Pantheon.
Habermas, Jurgen (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Thomas McCarthy (trans.), Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action.
C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen (trans.), Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johnson, Marysia (2004). A philosophy of second language acquisition. New York: Yale University Press.
Lantolf, James P. & Thorne, Steven L. (2000). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, James P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, James P. (2011). The Sociocultural Approach to Second Language Acquisition. Dwight Atkinson (ed.). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, London: Routledge.
Long, Michael (1983). Linguistics and conversational adjustment to nonnative speakers. Journal of Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 177-93.
Nielsen, Greg (1995). Toward a transcultural ethics. Theory and Society, 24 (6),  803-835.
Nikfar, M. R. (1389 [2010 A.D]). Xošunat, hoqug-e bašar, jāme'eh-ye madani. (2nd ed.). Tehrān: Entešārāt-e Tarh-e Nu.
Taqaviyān, N. 'A., & Qā'edi, Y., & Zarghāmi, S., & Gholāmi, J. (1393 [2014 A.D]). Kārbordšenāsi-e tajrobi va kasri-e hanjārmandi: bahreh-ye āmuzeš-e zabān-e xāreji az nazariyeh-ye kārbordšenāsi-e jahāni. Motāle'āt-e Miyān rešteh-i dar 'Olum-e ensāni, 6 (23), 77-116.
Tomasello, M. (1986). Thought and Language. Trans. Alex Kozulin, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A use-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, Lev (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. James V. Wertesh (ed.). The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.
Wittgenstein, L., (1953). Philosophical investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.
 
CAPTCHA Image