Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, English Language & Literature dep., Faculty of Literature and Humanistic Sciences, University of Sistan & Baluchestan.

2 M.A. in Linguistics, University of Sistan & Baluchestan (Coresponding Author).

Abstract

Ideology is a meaningful structure that involves in production, reproduction and changing unequal power relations. By means of meaning, ideology connects to discourse and language which is the device of meaning production. Ideologies are generated and transformed in actual discursive events. Press headlines are also discursive events. Based on critical discourse analysis and by using Van Leeuwen's theoretical framework (1996) and socio-semantic features of the framework like exclusion, inclusion, appraisement, association and differentiation, this study will try to analyze the way of representation of ideologies about Iran's nuclear program in a selection of national and international newspapers’ headlines during 2011-2012. By determining and comparing the frequency of the socio-semantic features during 2011- 2012, this question will be answered that how ideology is represented in national and international newspapers about Iran's nuclear program by using socio-semantic features during 2011- 2012, and whether the way of representation and the amount of these features are the same in both groups? To do this 242 headlines of two national newspapers, Keyhan and Iran, and two foreign newspapers, The Washington post and The Guardian were selected. Then the headlines were analyzed by using an analytical–descriptive method. The findings showed that both local and international newspapers use the same kind of features to reflect the news, but the amount of the features, especially in using of exclusion, and the way they are used, is different according to the newspaper's policy. In fact by utilizing specific features, the newspapers actually show the ideology they advocate. Actually having different ideologies have led to use the features in different ways.

Keywords

Āqāgol Zādeh, F. (1390 [2011 A.D]). Tahlil-e Goftmān-e Enteqādi. Tehrān: Entešārāt-e Elmi va Farhangi.
Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (eds.), Text and Practices:Readings in CDA. London: Rutledge
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman
Fairclough, N. (1996). Language and Power. London: Longman
Fairclough, N. (2004). Analyzing Discourse. London: Rutledge
Ghiyāsiyān, M. (1388 [2009 A.D]). Bāztāb-e negareš-e farhangi-e gharb nesbat beh Irān dar sāxtār hā-ye zabāni dar našriyāt-e engelisi zabān. Faslnāmeh-ye Tahqiqāt-e Farhangi-e Iran, 2 (1), 123-139.
Hall, S. (2013). Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. UK: Sage Publications
Hamilton, H.E (eds.), Handbook Of Discourse. London: Routledge.
Izadi, F., Saqāye Bi riyā, H. (1387 [2008 A.D]). Tahlil-e goftmān-e enteqādi-e ruznāmeh hā-ye barjasteh-ye Āmrikā darbāreh-ye enerži-e hasteh-ie Irān. (translated by: Akbar zadeh, S. J. Našriyeh-ye Resāneh. 16 (1), 10-125.
Mahdi Zādeh, S. M. (1378 [1999 A.D]). Resāneh hā va Bāznamāyi. Tehrān: Vezārat-e Farhang va Eršād-e Eslāmi.
Rabi΄i,΄A., & Ahmad zādeh Nāmvar, F. (1387 [2008 A.D]). Nazariyeh-ye bāznamayi-e resāneh hā va tahlil-e afkār-e ΄omumi-e moteqābel-e āmrikāyi hā va irāni hā. Majaleh-ye Dāneš-e Siyāsi, 4 (2), 37-62.
Razmju, Ā., & Sānavi, S. (1387 [2008 A.D]). Barresi-e šiveh hā-ye tasvir sāzi-e kārgozārān dar zabān-e axbār: tahlil-e enteqādi bā ΄enāyat beh mo΄alefeh hā-ye jāme΄eh šenāxti- ma΄nāyi. Faslnāmeh-ye Pāzand, 4 (13), 41-65.
Šams, M.R. (1385 [2006 A.D]). Barresi-e Goftmān-e Enteqādi-e Masa΄leh-ye Hasteh-ie Irān dar Ruznāmeh hā-ye Engelis (resāleh-ye doktori-e). Esfahān: Dānešgāh-e Esfahān. 
Soltāni, ΄A. A. (1384 [2005 A.D]). Qodrat, Goftmān va Zabān: Sāz va Kār hā-ye Jaryān-e Qodrat dar Jomhuri-e Eslāmi-e Irān. Tehrān: Našr-e Ney.
Soltāni, ΄A. A., & Šāqāsemi, E. (1389 [2010 A.D]). Āyā in mard beh bomb-e atom dast miyābad? Negāhi beh bāznamayi-e monāqešāt-e atomi-e Irān dar matbu΄āt-e Āmrikā. Majaleh-ye Jahāni-e Resāneh, 10, 1-14.
Soltāni, ΄A. A., Tafazoli, B., & Sedqi Čukānu, R. (1387 [2008 A.D]). Tahlil-e goftmān-e resāneh hā. Faslnāmeh-ye ΄Olum-e Siyāsi, 42, 65-94.
Van Leeuwen, T. A. (1996). The Representation of Social Actors. In Caldas
Van Leeuwen, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Practice. London: Oxford University press
Van Leeuwen, T. A. (2009). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Schiffrine, D. Tanen. &
Yārmohamadi, L. (1383 [2004 A.D]). Goftmān Šenāsi-e Rāyej va Enteqādi. Tehrān: Entešārāt-e Hermes.
Yārmohamadi, L., Rašidi, N. (1382 [2003 A.D]). Pažuheši dar mizān-e serāhat yā pušidegi-e payām dar gozideh-ye sar maqāleh hā-ye ruznāmeh hā-ye Irān: rābeteh-ye beyn-e sāxtār hā-ye goftmān madār va sāxtār hā-ye zir banāyi-e fekri- ejtemā΄i. Majaleh-ye Nāmeh-ye Farhang, 3 (47), 23-59.
CAPTCHA Image