Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Payam-e-Noor University.

2 Professor of Strategic Management, Faculty of Social Science, Payam-e-Noor University.

3 Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Social Science, Islamic Azad University Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor of Sociology of Development, Faculty of Social Science, Payam-e-Noor University.

Abstract

The conversion of a large number of people to the emerging spiritual sect (hereafter mentioned as “the M sect” in the current study) indicates a socio-cultural trend and the current study attempts to identify its causes and effective factors. Qualitative methodology in the form of Grounded Theory has been applied. Data were collected through distributing a semi-structured questionnaire in an in-depth interview from fourteen participants. Findings constitute a two-step paradigm model where the dimensions and major elements include: A) preliminary conditions: stresses of religious life in the modern age, lack of acceptability in the traditional religious culture, emotional detachment; B) causal conditions: spiritual needs, epistemic crisis, physical or mental illnesses; C1) The central phenomenon and context: the feeling of distress with regard to intensity, continuity, and diversity; D1) Strategy: reference to traditional religious texts, medical treatment, psychotherapy, counseling, exercise; E1) intervening conditions: lack of acceptability in the religious culture; F1) Result: inefficient or partially efficient of strategy and continuity of the feeling of distress; C2) the feeling of distress with desperation; D2) choosing the spiritual method proposed by M; E2) value system, religious socialization and lack of congruence with the religious culture, the congruence of the sect with the general culture, having fresh viewpoints and the acceptability of explanations provided by the sect, objective reports on the effectiveness of the practices in the sect, open membership, and the quality and quantity of the network of relations with members in the sect; F2) Conversion that has instrumental and ultimate interpretations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Geertz, C. (1966). Religion as a cultural system, in M. Banton, Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. A. S.A. Monographs no.3. London: Tavistock.
Marjaei, S.H. (2001).Barresi-ye E’teqādāt-e dini va jahatgiri-ye sekolāristi va bonyādgerāyi dar beyn-e javānān-e dānešgāhi[Religious beliefs and secular orientation among the university youth]. Research Paper, 5(20&21), 129-143.
Mohaddesi Gilvaei, H. (2016). Jaryānhā-ye dini va ma’navi-ye badi’: Barresi va naqd-e ruykardhā-ye tabyini, jahatgirihā-ye hanjārin va rāhbordhā-ye amali [New religious and spiritual movements: critics of explanatory approaches, normal orientations and practical strategies]. In Gh. Ghaffari & M.R. Javadi Yegane, The Report of Social Status of the Country (Vol. 2; 1st ed.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (2008). Osul va raveš tahqiq-e Keyfi; Nazariye-ye mabnāei, raviyehā va ravešhā [Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory] (2nd ed.; B. Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Original work published 1996)
CAPTCHA Image