Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

The circumstances and factors contributing to the development of good governance in social media with a focus on transparency component: A grounded theory study

Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Authors
H. Eslami 1
H. Emadi 2
S.A. Afshani 3
1 Assistant Professor of Government Management, Department of Human Sciences, Yazd Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
2 PhD Student of Media Management, Yazd Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
3 Professor of Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
10.22035/jicr.2022.3034.3366
Abstract
This study employs grounded theory (GT) to qualitatively explore preconditions for good governance in social media with an emphasis on accountability. The study sample consists of 20 media activists and social media managers who were selected using a theoretical or purposive sampling strategy. The data were collected through in-depth interviews with participants. The data collection process continued until saturation, i.e., no new pieces of information could add to the final model. The data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding, and then a paradigm model and a theoretical schema were developed based on the 15 main themes and the final theme extracted. The results indicated that the “tamed power of sovereignty” is the fruit of a set of factors such as accountability soft punch, reverse control and monitoring, popular network activism, and networked pressure groups, influenced by a set of contextual and intervening factors. What can cause public trust and social solidarity as the ultimate goal is the adoption of strategies such as normalization of accountability, good pragmatism, the networked activity of governing bodies, and institutional accountability of the government and then moving towards the establishment of an online accountability system. The theoretical schema and paradigm model proposed in this study can interpret the results more accurately.
Keywords
good governance
online accountability
tamed power of sovereignty
social media

Subjects

Afshani, S., Ruhani, A., & Kiani-Dehkiani, H. (2019). Exploring job powerlessness of nurses. Strategic Research on Social Problems in Iran, 8(3), 1-18. doi: 10.22108/srspi.2020.120991.1487
Aldons, M. (2001). Responsible, representative and accountable government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(1), 34-42.  doi:10.1111/1467-8500.00196
Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). Governance and social media in African countries: An empirical investigation. Telecommunications Policy, 43(5), 411-425. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3271787
Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 45-55.  doi: 10.1177/0020852300661005 
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
Chon, M. G., & Fondren, E. (2019). Seeing a crisis through colored glasses: How partisan media leads to attribution of crisis responsibility and government trust. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), 1-9.  doi: 10.1002/pa.1950
Damavandi Kenari, A., Tabatabaiepanah, S., & Safaverdi, S. (2021). Explanation of the possibilities and tools of mass media on the formation of good governance in developing societies with emphasis on global experiences. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 13(1), 43-61.
Faber, B., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2020). Assessing social media use in Dutch municipalities: Political, institutional, and socio-economic determinants. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101484. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101484
Flick, U. (2016). An introduction to qualitative, research (H. Jalili, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Hartmann, J., & Uhlenbruck, K. (2015). National institutional antecedents to corporate environmental performance. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 729-741.  doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.02.001 
Hashemian, S. M. H., Rahmati, M. H., Hamidizadeh, A., & Moradi, P. (2020). Recognizing a comprehensive pattern for assessing the accountability of the government by Meta-synthesis method. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 241-260. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2020.75199
Homburg, V., & Moody, R. (2021). Government There’sa pothole in my street!: Canadian citizens’ adoption choices of social media use in citizen‐government relations. Canadian Public Administration, 64(4), 631-656. doi: 10.1111/capa.12436 
Howitt, D. & Cramer, D. (2011). Grounded Theory. In D. Howitt & D. Cramer (Eds), Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 343-357). Essex: Pearson Education.
Iman, M., & Ghafarinasab, E. (2016). A new approach to the social construction of new technologies. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(85), 145-164.
Ingrams, A., & Schachter, H. L. (2019). E‐participation opportunities and the ambiguous role of corruption: A model of municipal responsiveness to sociopolitical factors. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 601-611. doi: 10.1111/puar.13049 
Jafari, S., & Abdollahzadeh, Z. (2019). Investigating the effect of gamification mechanisms on the success of crowdsourcing projects in e-governance: The case study of Shahrekord’s citizens participation in beautifying the city. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 12(1), 131-154. doi: 10.22035/jicr.2019.382
Jalali, M., & Azhar, Z. (2016). Government accountability: Position, dimensions and pre-conditions. Comparative law Research Quarterly, 20(1), 21-43.
Kanyane, M., Mutema, E. P., & Zikhali, T. (2020). Social accountability in local government: lessons from Vuwani (South Africa) and Gweru (Zimbabwe). Journal of Public Affairs, e2581.  doi: 10.1002/pa.2581 
Kasadha, J. (2020). Does social media matter in developing democracies? Examining its impact on citizen political participation and expression in Uganda. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), 1-10.  doi: 10.1002/pa.1981 
Kaufmann, W., & Lafarre, A. (2021). Does good governance mean better corporate social performance? A comparative study of OECD countries. International Public Management Journal, 24(6), 762-791.  doi: 10.1080/10967494.2020.1814916 
khanbashi, M., Zahedi, S., & M. Alvani, S. (2011). Accountability: The basis for public trust improvement. Quarterly of Order & Security Guards, 4(14), 29-54.
Matani, M., & Hasanpour, M. (2013). Investigating mass media in improving the level of accountability of government organizations. Management Quarterly, 11(34), 60-72.
Mazidi, M., Taghipuo, F., & Afshani, SA. (2018). A qualitative study of youth use of social media, a grounded theory. Societal Security Studies, 9(53), 87-130.
Moghimi, J., Safavardi, S., Naderpour, B., & Mohebbinia, J. (2021). The place of the principle of accountability in the realization of citizenship rights in the political system. MLJ., 15, 183-195.
Newman, L.W. (2010). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (A. Faqihi, & A. Aghaz, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Termeh.
Noroozpour, H., Parvin, K., Rostami, V., Hosseini, I. (2021). Investigating the role of accountability on sustainable development Emphasizing on the parliamentary accountability of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 13(4), 291-304. doi: 10.30495/jisds.2021.19455
Olsen, J. P. (2013). The institutional basis of democratic accountability. West European Politics, 36(3), 447-473. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.753704
Pourezzat, A., & Taheriattar, G. (2010). Application of good governance for nation building in light of interdisciplinary studies. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 3(1), 173-193.  doi: 10.7508/isih.2011.09.006
Rahnavard, F., Jokar, A., Taherpour, H., rasouli, M. (2019). Developing a social accountability framework for public organizations in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 7(2), 115-134. doi: 10.30473/ipom.2019.36912.2905
Rangriz, H. (2020). Governments’accountability discourse in the administrative system using critical discourse analysis. Public Policy, 6(1), 203-222. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2020.77000
 Rezaee, N., Saeidi, R. (2021). Media literacy and its impact on new governance in the age of postmodern state. Letter of Culture and Communication, 5(1), 289-312. doi: 10.30497/lcc.2021.240098.1025
Schatz, F. (2013). Fighting corruption with social accountability: A comparative analysis of social accountability mechanisms’ potential to reduce corruption in public administration. Public Administration and Development, 33(3), 161–74. doi: 10.1002/pad.1648
Seidman, S. (2016). Contested knowledge: Social theory today (H. Jalili, Trans.) Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. (2019). Is all publicity good publicity? The impact of direct and indirect media pressure on the adoption of governance practices. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1368-1393. doi: 10.1002/smj.3030 
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2017). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for grounded theory (E. Afshar. Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Vaezi, R., Azmandian, M. (2011). Three ـdimensional accountability model: A different vision toward accountability. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 6(1), 131-155.
waheduzzaman, W., & Khandaker, S. (2022). E‐participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross‐country data analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 1-21. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12544
Zeimaran, M. (2016). Michel Foucault: Knowledge and Power. Tehran, Iran: Hermes.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 03 June 2022
  • Revise Date 23 October 2022
  • Accept Date 12 November 2022