Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

Phenomenological study on lived experience of students and professors about virtual education during Covid-19 pandemic: Case study, University of Isfahan

Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Author
Z. Maher
Assistant Professor in Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
10.22035/jicr.2022.3084.3402
Abstract
Education field experts believe that effects and consequences of the Coronavirus pandemic on education in general and on higher education in particular are not only less than the other social institutions, but are much more comprehensive. In this study, an attempt is being made to represent lived experiences and perceptions of students and teachers in the virtual education system. Therefore, the main purpose of this research is to assess the same among professors and students of the University of Isfahan during the Covid-19 pandemic in order to identify the most important challenges of this type of education in universities and by relying on the findings of the study, effective solutions and approaches are presented for improving virtual education in universities. In the course of study, “phenomenology” has been used as a qualitative method whereas the research population includes all students and professors in the University of Isfahan in the academic year of 2020-2021. Total participants in the qualitative part of research were 32 people consisting of 14 professors and 18 students. Based on the purposive sampling, a mixture was selected and interviewed. The data was evaluated using Colaizzi’s seven step method (1978).  Findings showed that the damages incurred by virtual education damage are: “educational damage”, “damages related to university culture”, damages related to social-economic infrastructures” and “damage from reduced sense of presence”.
Keywords
virtual education
damages and challenges
lived experience
university culture
sense of presence
University of Isfahan

Subjects

Adnan, M., Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51.  doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Almaiah, M.A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2021). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Anderson, T.A., & Elloumi, F. (1385). Yadgiri-ye Elektroniki: az te’ori ta amal [Theory and practice of online learning] (E. Zamani, & A. Azimi, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Mo’assese-ye towse’e-ye Āmuzeš-e Madāres-e Hušmand.
Barton, S. M. (2013). Social capital framework in the adoption of E-learning. International Jl. on E-Learning, 12(2), 115-137.
Bejerano, A. R. (2008). The genesis and evolution of online degree programs: who are they for and what have we lost along the way? Commun. Edu., 57, 408–414. doi:10.1080/03634520801993697
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Pp. 241–58), New York: Greenwood Press.
Collizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R.S. Valls, & M. King (Eds.), Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (Pp. 48-71). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dreyfus, H. (1389). Darbari-ye Internet: Negahi falsafi be Internet [On the internet] (A. Farsijezad, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Saqi. (Original work published 2001)
Fazeli, N. (1387). Farhang va dānešgāh [Culture and university]. Tehran, Iran: Sāles.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors that impact their involvement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3) 1-15. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.683
Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Commun. Res, 35, 190–207. doi:10.1177/0093650207313159
Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of distance education based on empathy. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 79–86). Hamburg: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jefferson, R. N., & Arnold, L. W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic culture perceived advantages and disadvantages. US-China Education Review, 6(3), 61- 66.
Joy, D. (2004). Instructors transitioning to online education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, US.
Keller, C.H., Lindh, J., Hrastinski, S., Casanovas, I., & Fernandez, G. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-learning implementation: A comparative study of an Argentinean and a Swedish University. Educational Media International, 46(1), 67-80.  doi: 10.1080/09523980902781253
Kian, M. (1393). Čālešhā-ye āmuzeš-e majāzi: revāyat-e ānče dar dānešgāh-e majāzi āmuxte nemišavad [Chellenges of virtual education: A report of what are not learned]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virrtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 5(3), 11-22.
Lehman, R., & Concelcao, S. (1395). Ijād-e hese hozur dar tadris-e bar xat: čegunegi-ye bar ham budan barāye yādgirandegan-e āmuzeš az rāh-e door [creating the sense of being in on-line teaching: being with eachother for distance learners] (A. Esfijani, R. Khodabandelou, & A. Khazaei). Isfahan, Iran: University of Isfahan.
Mirzaei, H. (1399). Jostārhāyi dar āmuzeš-e Ǡli, elm-e va bohrān-e Coronā in Iran [Essays on higher education, Science and Corona Crisis in Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies.
Mohammadpour, A. (1390). Raveš tahqiq-e zed-e raveš 2 [qualitative method of anti-method 2] (1st ed.). Tehran, Iran: Jāme’ešenāsān.
Newman, A. (2003). Measuring successin Web-based distance learning. ECAR Research Study, 4,  www.educause.edu/ecar
Openo, J. (2020). Education’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic reveals online education’s three enduring challenges. Canadian Journal of Elearning and Technology, 46(2). doi: 10.21432/cjlt27981
Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 64-68.  doi:10.3390/ijerph17186468
Shea P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Comput Educ. 52(3):543-53. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Song, H., Kim, J., & Park, N. (2019). I know my professor: teacher self-disclosure in online education and a mediating role of social presence. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(6), 448–455. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455126
Stodel, E.J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3),1-24.
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Comput. Human Behav. 28(5), 1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
Zhu. C., et. al. (2008). Students’ perceptions of motivation and learning strategies in a constructivist E-learning environment: Comparing Chinese and Flemish university Sstudents, Proceedings of the first EARLI Advanced Study Colloquium, January 2008, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
 
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.