Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

Journal of Iranian Cultural Research

Emergence of developmental character-based discourse in post-revolutionary Iran (1989-2001)

Document Type : Scientific Research Manuscript

Author
PhD in Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This article examines the emergence of a Developmental Character-Based Discourse  in post-revolutionary Iran (1989–2001). The dominant revolutionary discourse initially emphasized “innate guidance” and a “divine human being,” rendering early character narratives unrelated to developmentalism. The war’s end and practical necessities revived character-based discourse. The core question is how this shift from “revolutionary essentialism” to a “Developmental Character-Based Discourse” occurred and was reconfigured in cultural and social policymaking. The shift emerged through a realignment of official discourse that redefined “backwardness” as a threat to Islamic values and promoted “civilization-building.” Developmentalist social and political scientists, stressing the measurement and management of Iranian “attitudes” and “character traits,” played a pivotal role. Alongside state institutions—especially IRIB and the Supreme Council of Cultural Policy—they constructed a new character-driven subjectivity aligned with state developmental objectives. This project crystallized in initiatives like the “Survey of Iranian Values and Attitudes,” which aimed not to empower society but to control and harmonize behaviors to establish a desirable “social order” and support economic development. Thus, the discourse moderated public expectations and legitimized state economic and cultural policies. Without analyzing such surveys directly, this study explores the historical context that made them relevant.
Keywords

Subjects


Abazari, Y., Riazi, A., et al. (n.d.). Hoviyyat-e qowmī va bāvar-hā-ye ejtemāʿī (kārgāh-e tahlīl-e yāfte-hā-ye peymāyesh-e mellī-ye arzesh-hā va negaresh-hā-ye Īrāniyān) [Ethnic Identity and Social Beliefs (Workshop on Analysis of Findings from the National Survey of Values and Attitudes of Iranians)]. Tehran, Iran: Enteshārāt-e Tarḥ-hā-ye Mellī. [In Persian]
Aleahmad, S. (1981). Kārnāme-ye Setād-e Enqelāb-e Farhangī [qesmat-e avval]. Miyzān, 127, 5. [In Persian]
Azad Armaki, T. (1997). Barrasi-ye nazariye-ye nowsāzi: Motāle ‘-ye-ye moredi darbāre-ye taqdir-garā’i-ye farhangi dar Irān [A study of modernization theory: A case study on cultural fatalism in Iran].  Farhang, 22-23, 191-208. [In Persian]
Bagheri, K. (1985). Marāhel-e roshd: Taḥavvolāt-e ʿaqlī-ye nowjavān va hedāyat-e īn taḥavvolāt [Stages of Development: Cognitive Transformations of Adolescents and Guiding These Transformations]. Roshd-e Moʿallem, 24, 8–10 & 63. [In Persian]
Bahonar, M. J. (1981). Enqelāb-e farhangī va dāneshgāh-hā [The Cultural Revolution and Universities]. Farhang-e Enqelāb (organ-e Setād-e Enqelāb-e Farhangī), 2, 3–5. [In Persian]
Behzad, H. (1995). Āmrīkā be īn mamlekat tofangdār nemīferestad, qalam-be-dast mīferestad [America Does Not Send Gunmen to This Country, It Sends Pen-Wielders]. Sobḥ, 29, 12. [In Persian]
Bennett, T. (1992). Putting Policy into Cultural Studies. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 23-34). New York: Routledge.
Chalabi, M. (2013). Barrasī-ye tajrobī-ye nezām-e shakhṣiyyat dar Īrān [An Empirical Study of the Personality System in Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Daneshgahe Enghelab (1993). Mīzgird-e barrasī-ye vāzeʿiyat-e jāmeʿ-shenāsī dar Īrān [Roundtable: Examining the State of Sociology in Iran]. Dāneshgāh-e Enqelāb, 97, 9–28. [In Persian]
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princton, New Jersey:   Princeton University Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goudarzi, M. (1995). Cherā mardom hame chīz rā az dowlat mīkhwāhand? [Why Do People Expect Everything from the Government?]. Hamshahrī, 755, 12. [In Persian]
Goudarzi, M. (2008). Naqdī-ye ravish-shenākhtī bar ketāb-e Farhang-e sīyāsī-ye Īrān / Farhang: ʿāmel yā maʿlūl-e towseʿe-nayāftagī [A Methodological Critique of the Book Political Culture of Iran / Culture: Cause or Effect of Underdevelopment]. Etemād, 1643, 6. [In Persian]
Grossberg, L. (1992). We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture. New York and London: Routledge.
Hall, S. (1986).  On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hal .(ed. Lawrence Grossberg), Journal of Communication Inquiry 10(2), 45–60.
Heshamati, M. R. (2005). Omid va negaranī dar ḥowze-ye dīn: barrasī-ye peymāyesh-e arzesh-hā va negaresh-hā-ye Īrāniyān [Hope and Concern in the Domain of Religion: An Analysis of the National Survey of Iranian Values and Attitudes]. Tehran, Iran: Vezārat-e Farhang va Ershād-e Eslāmī, Daftar-e Tarh-hā-ye Mellī. [In Persian]
Karbasian, A. A. (2002). Pīsh-shart-e towseʿe: Pālāyesh-e kholqiyyāt-e manfī, erāʾe-ye tafsīrī-ye now az jahānbīnī-ye Īrānī [Prerequisite for Development: Purifying Negative National Traits, Presenting a New Interpretation of the Iranian Worldview]. Gozāresh, 130, 76–81. [In Persian]
Kousari, M. (1996). Negāresh-hā: Sākht va kārkard-hā-ye ān [Attitudes: Their Structure and Functions]. Pazhūhesh va Sanjesh, 8, 76–83. [In Persian]
Larrain, J. (1996). Stuart Hall and the marxist concept of ideology. in Stuart Hall Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (ed. David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen), New York and London: Routledge.
Mirshakkak, Y. (1995). Pursesh az māhiyyat-e modernite [Questioning the Essence of Modernity]. Ṣobḥ, 25, 7 & 14. [In Persian]
n.a. (1985). Qatʿnāme-ye semīnār-e roʾasā-ye āmūzesh va parvaresh-e manāṭeq-e keshvar [Resolution of the National Seminar of Provincial Directors of Education]. Roshd-e Moʿallem, 24, 62. [In Persian]
N.A. (1988). Tazmīn-e ḥayāt-e farhang-e mellī dar barābar-e hojūm-e farhangī-ye bīgāne [Guaranteeing the Survival of National Culture against Foreign Cultural Invasion]. Keyhān, 13408, 5. [In Persian]
Nameye Farhang (1997). Farhang va kārsāzī (mīzgird) [Culture and Efficacy (Roundtable)]. Name-ye Farhang, 26, 16–47. [In Persian]
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (2004). Powers of Freedom Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Saeedian, E. (1995). Farāyand-e towseʿe-ye farhangī va shahm-e resāne-hā (mīzgird) [The Process of Cultural Development and the Share of Media (Roundtable)]. Pazhūhesh va Sanjesh, 7, 6. [In Persian]
Samaram, E. (1984). Moshkelāt-e raftārī-ye dānesh-āmūzān: Moshkel-e Maryam [Behavioral Problems of Students: Maryam’s Problem]. Roshd-e Moʿallem, 17, 56–59. [In Persian]
Samaram, E. (1986). Moshkel-e Leylā [Leila’s Problem]. Roshd-e Moʿallem, 27, 24–28. [In Persian]
Sariolghalam, M. (1992). Sonnat, modernism va farhang-e towseʿe [Tradition, Modernism and the Culture of Development]. Ettelāʿāt-e Sīyāsī-Eqteṣādī, 61–62, 26–30. [In Persian]
Slack, J. D. (1996). ‘The theory and method of articulation In cultural studies’. in Stuart Hall Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (ed. David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen), New York and London: Routledge.
Towfigh, E., Yousefi, S. M., Heydari, A., Torkaman, Ḥ. (2019). Barāmadan-e zhānr-e kholqiyyāt dar Īrān [The Rise of the Kholqiyyāt (National Character Studies) Genre in Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Pajūheshgāh-e Farhang, Honar va Ertebāṭāt. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 20 October 2025
  • Revise Date 08 December 2025
  • Accept Date 14 December 2025