آرایی، و. (۱۴۰۲). دیپلماسی علم و فناوری و الهام‌بخشی اسلامی و منطقه‌ای جمهوری اسلامی ایران. مطالعات بیداری اسلامی، ۱۲ (۲)، ۹۵-۱۱۶. https://doi.org/10.1001.1.23225645.1402.12.2.5.1
باغبان، م.، و سنایی، ا. (۱۴۰۳). تبیین رویکردهای دیپلماسی علم و فناوری جمهوری اسلامی ایران. سیاست‌نامه علم و فناوری، ۱۴ (۲)، ۴۴-۵۸. https://doi.org/10.1001.1.24767220.1403.14.2.3.4
صنیع‌اجلال، مریم (۱۴۰۴). رویکردهای راهبردی در تحقق دیپلماسی علمی از طریق جذب دانشجویان بین‌المللی: تحلیل چالش‌ها و فرصت‌ها در برنامه هفتم توسعه ایران. راهبرد، ۳۴ (۴)، ۹۷۹-۱۰۱۲. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahbord.2025.543437.1854
قویدل، س.، دانش، ف.، و قره‌بقلو، و. (۱۴۰۴). پژوهشی پیرامون نقش همگرایی دیپلماسی علم و حکمرانی داده در زیست‌بوم علم، فناوری و نوآوری. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، ۱۱ (۲)، ۳۳-۷۰. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2024.10719.2096
Adamson, M., & Lalli, R. (2021). Global perspectives on science diplomacy: Exploring the diplomacy-knowledge nexus in contemporary histories of science. Centaurus, 63(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12369
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2004.9967114
Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLOS Biology, 14(12), e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933
Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2001). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities. Walter de Gruyter.
Beigel, F. (2014). Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET. Current Sociology, 62(5), 743-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533977
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Collyer, F. M. (2018). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020
Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284
De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
Demeter, M. (2020). Academic knowledge production and the Global South: Questioning inequality and under-representation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R., & Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Domingues, A. A., & Ribeiro Neto, P. H. (2017). Science diplomacy as a tool of international politics: The power of ‘soft power’. Brazilian Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 607-629. https://doi.org/10.36311/2237-7743.2017.v6n3.09.p607
Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x
du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (2013). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. SAGE Publications.
Fedoroff, N. V. (2009). Science diplomacy in the 21st century. Cell, 136(1), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.030
Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665-677. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X12778118264530
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gluckman, P. D., Turekian, V., Grimes, R. W., & Kishi, T. (2017). Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside. Science & Diplomacy, 6(4). http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128-138). Hutchinson.
Hamel, R.E. (2007) The Dominance of English in the International Scientific Periodical Literature and the Future of Language Use in Science. AILA Review, 20, 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.06ham
Hanauer, D. I., Sheridan, C. L., & Englander, K. (2019). Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers. Written Communication, 36(1), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821
Heilbron, J. (2014). The social sciences as an emerging global field. Current Sociology, 62(5), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533100
Komiyama, H., Kajikawa, Y., Mejia, C., Elsamani, Y., & Fukushi, K. (Eds.). (2025). AI, innovation, and beyond: A report from STS forum 2025. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-7020-1
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lord, K. M., & Turekian, V. C. (2007). Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science, 315(5813), 769-770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139880
Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Ruffini, P. B. (2017). Science and diplomacy: A new dimension of international relations. Springer.
Ruffini, P. B. (2020). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: A critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 124. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5
Rungius, C., & Flink, T. (2020). Romancing science for global solutions: On narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2015). Being ‘lazy’ and slowing down: Toward decolonizing time, our body, and pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 488-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.880645
Shapin, S. (2012). The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435375
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.
The Royal Society. (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power (RS Policy Document 01/10). The Royal Society & AAAS.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
